Abstract:
The surrogacy phenomenon has existed since ancient biblical times in which the barren Sarrai offers her maid Hagar to her husband Abraham to have a child with her. This relationship formed between Hagar and Sarrai, created conflicts that exist to this day. This article was written as part of the doctoral thesis, and aims to present the nature of the relationship that exists between the Israeli intended mothers and the Israeli surrogates, the intended mothers who have chosen to apply for surrogacy outside the country’s borders, and examine the relationship between the surrogates who were all Israelis to the Israeli intend mothers. The subject was explored in sociological aspects, according to Symbolic interaction Theory, which is a sociological theory that was presented to the American sociology by George Herbert Mead at the 1920s. The method that was approach is the qualitative method. The present study comprised of 70 women residing in Israel. The women’s ages ranged between 22 and 64 (M = 36.59, SD = 8.53). The women were sampled from two different groups. The first group comprised of 34 intended mothers who underwent a surrogacy process (41.4%). The second group comprised of 36 surrogate mothers who have undergone a pregnancy for other couples (51.4%). Analysis of the content done on the data collected from the interviews revealed two main themes – Emotions and Values involved in the interaction between the intended mother’s and the surrogate. This study opens the door to a variety of emotions and values that involve and guide the interaction between the two groups of mothers and allows a rare glimpse into the depths of the souls of women who are unable to have a child and women who are willing to fulfill another woman’s dream and, thus, sometimes, their altruistic aspirations.
Keywords:
surrogacy, motherhood, victim, interactionism, surrogate mother, intended mother, social worker.
How to cite:
Silvern, R., Cojocaru, S. Interaction between Surrogate Mother and Intended Mother: Sociological Aspects in Surrogacy. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 77, 89-105, DOI: 10.33788/rcis.77.6
References
Arvidsson, A, Vauquline, P., Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2017). Surrogate mother – praiseworthy or stigmatized: a qualitative study on perceptions of surrogacy in Assam, India. Global Health Action, 10(1), 1328890, DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1328890.
Baram O. (2015). Two view at surrogacy.Tel Aviv Kibbutzim Seminary College. Gunnarsson Payne, J., Korolczuk, E., & Mezinska, S. (2020). Surrogacy relationships: a critical interpretative review. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 125(2), 183-191, DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1725935.
Edelmann, R.J. (2004). Surrogacy: the psychological issues. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22(2), 123-136, DOI: 10.1080/0264683042000205981. Genesis (16:2) Berashit.
Ministry of Health (1996). The Israeli Embryo Carrying Agreement Law. Agreement Authorization & Status of the Newborn Child. Jerusalem: publication office of the Ministry of Health. [Hebrew]. Retrieved online from: https://www.health.gov.il/ English/ Topics/ fertility/ Surrogacy/Pages/default.aspx Ministry of Health. (1994). State Health Insurance Law: https://www.nevo.co.il/law_html/ law01/036_001.htm
Marx, K, & Engels, F. (1959/1972). (6th ed.). (Volume 4, pp. 459-493). Berlin: Karl Dietz. Naveh N. (2003). Sociology in the Circles of Cultural Society, Even Yehuda: Reches, pp. 29-30
Nickerson, C. (2021). Symbolic interaction theory & examples. Simply Psychology. www. simplypsychology.org/symbolic-interaction-theory.html U.S.
Government. (2016) Surrogacy Law and Policy in the U.S. A National Conversation Informed by Global Lawmaking. Report of the Columbia Law School: Sexuality & Gender Law Clinic.
Shapiro J. (2014). For a feminist considering surrogacy, is compensation really the key question? Washington Law Review. 89, 1345-1373.
Van den Akker, O. (2007). Psychological trait and state characteristics, social support and attitudes to the surrogate pregnancy and baby. Hum Reprod. 22:2287–95. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem155
Voskoboynik K. (2016). Clipping the stork’s wings: Commercial surrogacy regulation and its impact on fertility tourism. Ind. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 26(2), 336-382. DOI: 10.18060/7909.0043.
Ziv, I., Freund-Eschar, Y. (2015). The pregnancy experience of gay couples expecting a child through overseas pregnancy, 23, 158-166, DOI:10.1177/1066480714565107.