Clarifying the theory-based evaluation

Clarifying the theory-based evaluation

Stefan COJOCARU, 2009, „Clarifying the theory-based evaluation”, Revista de cercetare si interventie sociala, vol 26, pp. 76-86, ISSN: 1583-3410 (tipar), 1584-5397 (electronic).







The theory-based evaluation is one of the most used directions in evaluation, having the capacity to identify the program elements and their coherence. Beyond its variations, the applicability of theory-based evaluation renders it to remain attractive for specialists due to its approach perspectives and its solid conceptual construction; this direction is kept as a nucleus of program evaluation perspectives, incorporating new theoretical directions and experimental or quasi-experimental practices.
theory-based evaluation; implicit knowledge; logic model; program microtheory; program macrotheory; stakeholders; experimental design.
ISI Thomson Reuters, SCOPUS, Central and Eastern European Online Library, Index Copernicus, articol cotat ISI (Social Sciences Citation Index), categoria A, CNCSIS, no. 657

References

Bickman, L., 1987, „The functions of program theory”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 33, pp. 5-18.

Birckmayer, J.D., Weiss, C.H., 2000, “Theory-based evaluation in practice: what do we learn?”, Evaluation review, 24 (4), pp. 407-431.

Carvalho, S., White, H., 2004, „Theory-based evaluation: the case of social funds”, American journal of evaluation, 25(2), pp. 141-160.

Chen, H.T., 1990a, Theory-driven evaluation, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Chen, H.T., 1990b, „Issues in constructing program theory”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 47, pp. 7-18.

Chen, H.T., 1994a, „Theory-driven evaluations: need, difficulties, and options”, American journal of evaluation, 15(1), pp. 79-82.

Chen, H.T., 1994b, „Current trends and future directions in program evaluation”, American journal of evaluation, 15(3), pp. 229-238.

Chen, H.T., 2005, Practical program evaluation. Assessing and improving planning, implementation and effectiveness, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

Chen, H.T., Rossi, P.H., 1983, “Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven evaluation”, Evaluation Review, vol. 7, pp.283-302.

Cojocaru, S., 2007a, Cojocaru, S., 2007a, „Strategii de construire a eşantionelor calitative utilizate în evaluarea programelor”, [„Strategies for qualitative samples used in program evaluation”],  Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socialî, vol. 16, pp. 138-151.

Cojocaru, S., 2008, „Evaluarea apreciativă – formă a evaluării formative” [„Appreciative evaluation – form of formative evaluation”], Revista de cercetare si interventie sociala, vol. 20, pp.42-48.

Cojocaru, S., 2008, Cojocaru, S., 2007b, „Strategii de eşantionare cantitativă în procesul de evaluare a programelor” [„Strategies of quantitative sampling in the process of program evaluation”], Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială, vol. 19, pp. 115-127.

Cook, T., 2000, „The false choice between theory-based evaluation and experimentation”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 87, pp. 27-34.

Cooksy, L.J., Gill, P., Kelly, P.A., 2001, „The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation”, Evaluation and program planning, vol. 24, pp. 119-128.

Fitz-Gibbon, T.C., Lyons Morris, L., 1996, „Theory-based evaluation”, American journal of evaluation, 17(2), pp. 177-184.

McClinttock, C., 1990, „Administrators as applied theorists”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 47, pp. 19-33.

Patton, M.Q., 2008, Utilization-focused evaluation, Sage, Tousand Oaks, California.

Rogers, P., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T., Hacsi, T., 2000, „Program theory evaluation: practice, promise, and problems”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 87, pp. 5-13.

Scheirer, M.A., 1987, „Program theory and implementation theory: implications for evaluators”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 33, pp. 59-76.

Shadish, W.Jr., 1987, „Program micro- and macrotheories: a guide for social change”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 33, pp. 93-109.

Stake, R., 1967, „Countenance of educational evaluation”, Teachers College Records, vol. 68(7), pp. 523-540.

Stufflebeam, D., 2001, „Evaluation models”, New directions for evaluation, nr. 89, pp. 7-98.

Stufflebeam, D.L., 1983, „The CIPP model for program evaluation”, in Madaus, G.F., Scriven, M.S., Stufflebeam, D.L., Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation, Kluwer, Hingham, pp. 117-141.

Suchman, E., 1967, Evaluative research: principles and practice in public service and social action programs, Russel Sage Foundation, New York.

Weiss, C.H., 1972, Evaluation research: methods of assessing program effectiveness, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Weiss, C.H., 1972, Evaluation research: methods of assessing program effectiveness, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Weiss, C.H., 1997, „How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway”, Evaluation review, Vol. 21 (4), pp. 501-524.

Weiss, C.H., 2000, „Which links in with theories shall we evaluate”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 87, pp. 35-45.

Wholey, J., 1987, „Evaluability assessment: developing program theory”, New directions for evaluation, vol. 33, pp. 77-92.

line
footer